<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new FamilySearch</title>
	<link>http://www.beyondproject.org/2006/06/12/the-new-familysearch/</link>
	<description>Genealogy anywhere.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: New FamilySearch to Advance Temple Work &#124; LDS Temple Study Blog - Sustaining and Defending the LDS (Mormon) Temple</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondproject.org/2006/06/12/the-new-familysearch/#comment-28809</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.beyondproject.org/2006/06/12/the-new-familysearch/#comment-28809</guid>
					<description>[...] Print temple ordinance cards at home1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Print temple ordinance cards at home1 [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondproject.org/2006/06/12/the-new-familysearch/#comment-422</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.beyondproject.org/2006/06/12/the-new-familysearch/#comment-422</guid>
					<description>No worries, I have no intention of dropping it. :)  Even if Family Tree ends up doing a lot of what Beyond does, Beyond will continue to be a testbed for innovative ideas, especially as far as user interface and ease-of-use go.  There's a need for that.  And that's what I like doing. :)

Anyway, I'm on the Family History department's third-party developer list, which will mean access to the specs for the new Family Tree API, as well as enough information to make sure that Beyond doesn't tread too much on Family Tree's toes.  The world is big enough for both projects, methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries, I have no intention of dropping it. :)  Even if Family Tree ends up doing a lot of what Beyond does, Beyond will continue to be a testbed for innovative ideas, especially as far as user interface and ease-of-use go.  There&#8217;s a need for that.  And that&#8217;s what I like doing. :)</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m on the Family History department&#8217;s third-party developer list, which will mean access to the specs for the new Family Tree API, as well as enough information to make sure that Beyond doesn&#8217;t tread too much on Family Tree&#8217;s toes.  The world is big enough for both projects, methinks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hilton</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondproject.org/2006/06/12/the-new-familysearch/#comment-421</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.beyondproject.org/2006/06/12/the-new-familysearch/#comment-421</guid>
					<description>Yeah, it's pretty exciting.  They still have to play nice with a bigger world though, so don't drop Beyond!  I'm counting on it as the web front-end to the genealogy server I'm about to write :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s pretty exciting.  They still have to play nice with a bigger world though, so don&#8217;t drop Beyond!  I&#8217;m counting on it as the web front-end to the genealogy server I&#8217;m about to write :).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
